Bioengineering and Its Subsidiary Fields Essay examples -- Bacteria, Ge

Bioengineering and the Flaws of Consequentialism Pierce College Abstract In 1973 the first bacteria were patrimonialally modified. In 1974 mice were genetically modified. And in 1982 genetically modified bacteria able of producing insulin were commercialized. Genetically modified food has been sold since 1994. In a mistakable time frame, the ideologies of stem cell research and therapeutic procreative clone have come to fruition. It is the aim of this paper to demonstrate through consequentialist honest reasoning, particularly using the concepts of utilitarianism and relativism that no definitive judgment can be made on the morality and ethical correctness of ergonomics and its auxiliary fields of genetic manipulation, stem cell research and therapeutic reproductive cloning due to the obscure nature of the consequences of these acts. The paper will psychoanalyze a brief history of these emergent scientific disciplines and the still uncertain nature of the far-reaching conseque nces and implications of their implementation. Bioengineering and the flaws of consequentialism Bioengineering is a broad umbrella condition covering many different scientific disciplines. Under this umbrella are the specific studies of gene isolation, construction, targeting, trans take a leakation, selection, regeneration, transfer cellular engineering, and synthetic biology. Relative to the give-and-take of the ethical nature of this field are the principal topics of genetic and cellular engineering, stem cell research reproductive technologies to include gene alternate and transformation in humans and animals and bioengineered organic food. Bioengineering, in one form or another, has been around since the mid-20th century, with the term first coined in 1954 and w... ...tation among a bon ton of hereditarily dying people be worth the sustained existence of the high society? Possibly. Would the idea of genetically altering food for weather sustainability if the manhood wer e straightway threatened by harsh weather seem more satisfying? Again, possibly. There are no concrete answers to those questions objectively however. And in the world as we know it, in 2011, its similarly hard to study that any of the conditions currently affecting the rapidly globalizing world are of such a dire and unpreventable nature that they require tampering with the genetic foundations of our existence. However, another, somewhere else in the world might disagree, and that leads me to conclude that consequentialist reasoning whole is an unacceptable medium for the analysis and moral rationalization of the hard choices of bioengineering and its subsidiary fields.